The analysiss of impact of small and medium-sized enterprises on country innovation policy: Taiwan experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.159733

Keywords:

small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan, innovation policy, economic policy of the EU

Abstract

The object of research is the small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) of Taiwan. The implementation of the program Europe 2020 – construction of the innovation economy of the European Union (EU) countries is a priority of the EU. In Latvia, both on average and in the EU, 99.8 % of enterprises are SMEs. The search for indicators that influence the creation of an innovative economy and the inclusion of small and medium-sized businesses in the innovation environment is a problem not only for Latvia and the Baltic countries, but for the whole EU.Taiwan is one of the «Asian tigers», which made a huge economic jump-start from an agrarian country to an industrial one. The release in 2016 of a number of high-tech products, such as: Motherboards – 89.7 % of the world market, Cable CPE – 84.5 % and Notebook PCs – 83.5 % of the global market place. The country in a number of countries with innovative economies.Therefore analysis of Taiwan’s experience in building an innovative economy deserves further study and implementation in other countries.

For the research, the author used the following methods: content analysis – Information source form and content of a systematic, numerical processing evaluation and interpretation,and statistical analysis – Pearson, Spearman and Tau-Kendall correlation method. Using these methods indicators affecting the number of SMEs were selected. During the theoretical analysis, the author has formulated the advantages of small and medium businesses, conducted a search for indicators affecting small and medium enterprises and their involvement in the innovative environment of Taiwan.

The establishment of a linear relationship and the use of the correlation analysis of Pearson, Spearman and Tau Kendall, using SPSS program allowed the author to find the relationship between the indicators:

  • Number of Researchers (full time equivalent);
  • Annual Papers in Science Citation Index (SCI);
  • Annual Papers in Engineering Index (EI);
  • Number of SMEs;
  • Total Employment SMEs;
  • Number ofregistered patents.

The use of interrelated indicators solves an important economic task – improving the standard of living of the population based on innovation. Evaluation of these perfomences in the EU countries using econometric methods will allow to implement the innovation policy of states.

Author Biography

Inna Stecenko, Baltic International Academy, 4, Lomonosova str., Riga, Latvia, LV1019

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

References

  1. Baldwin, J. R., Hanel, P. (2003). The Economics of Knowledge Creation. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy.Cambridge University Press, 1–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511510847.001
  2. European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (EVCA). International Year Book and Statesmen’s Who’s Who. Brill. doi: http://doi.org/10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_org_39248
  3. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018
  4. Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., Kanerva, M. (2016). European Innovation Scoreboard 2016. European Union. Available at: https://www.knowledgetransferireland.com/Reports-Publications/European-Innovation-Scoreboard-2016.pdf
  5. Chen, S.-J. (2013). The Effects of Social Networks and a Global Mindset on Taiwanese Manufacturing SMES' Ability to Form Alliances to Increase International and Financial Performance. San Diego: Alliant International University, Alliant School of Management, 760.
  6. Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) of GDP. Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_20&plugin=1
  7. Taiwan Statistical Data Book 2018. National Development Council. Available at: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=607ED34345641980&sms=B8A915763E3684AC&s=B3B7911F9063C75F
  8. Bieńkowska, E., Moedas, C. European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. Available at: https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2017/06/European_Innovation_Scoreboard_2017.pdf
  9. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Available at: https://www.csb.gov.lv/en/
  10. Baldwin, J. R., Hanel, P. (2003). Research and Development and Innovation. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy. Cambridge University Press, 96–129. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511510847.005
  11. Hoyos López, M. (2017). Trade liberalization and premature deindustrialization in Colombia. Journal of Economic Structures, 6 (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-017-0095-6
  12. European Commission (1997). Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-96-1133_en.htm
  13. Baldwin, J. R., Hanel, P. (2003). Innovation and Research and Development in Small and Large Firms. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy. Cambridge University Press, 156–184. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511510847.007
  14. Soete, L. L. G. (1979). Firm size and inventive activity. European Economic Review, 12 (4), 319–340. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(79)90024-2
  15. White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan, 2009–2017.Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs. Available at: https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=307&CtUnit=36&BaseDSD=7&mp=2
  16. Orekhov, A. M. (2009). Metody ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy. Moscow: INFRA-M, 392.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Stecenko, I. (2018). The analysiss of impact of small and medium-sized enterprises on country innovation policy: Taiwan experience. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(45), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2019.159733

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research